login    register    help     
Expert Chats
Special Reports
Top News Stories
Week In Review Newsletter
All Topics
Affordable Housing Development & Finance
Economic Revitalization
Fair Housing
Homeownership & Mortgage Markets
Land Use & Housing Planning
Organizational Development
Personal Finance & Asset Creation
Public Housing
  Indian Housing
  Public Housing Authorities
  Section 8 & Housing Vouchers
Social & Comprehensive Development

Housing authority can be sued for shooting of tenant, rules Tennessee Supreme Court

Lawyers USA Staff Report
Lawyers USA
February 10, 2009
I hate it   I love it





A public housing authority can be sued for negligence by the family of a tenant who was shot and killed by another tenant, the Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a summary judgment. The plaintiffs' father lived in an apartment complex owned by the Memphis Housing Authority. He was shot and killed when a tenant with a history of violent attacks on other tenants fired a rifle at private security guards.

The plaintiffs sued for wrongful death, alleging that the housing authority was negligent in failing to provide adequate security. In particular, the plaintiffs alleged that the housing authority was negligent in failing to screen out a tenant with a history of violence and in failing to ensure that he did not possess a firearm.

The housing authority argued that it had no duty to protect tenants from the criminal acts of other tenants.

But the court disagreed, explaining that a "landlord and tenant qualify as having a special relationship. Further, violence in a housing project is, generally speaking, foreseeable. ... In consequence, precautions are warranted. ...

"The question, of course, is whether [the housing authority], with some general knowledge of criminal activity within its housing complexes and a particular knowledge of [the other tenant's] altercation with another tenant four years earlier, could have reasonably foreseen the probability of a violent act. We think so. Indeed, the risk of violent attack at a housing project is nothing new. The potential for violence in the [apartment complex] was, therefore, generally foreseeable by the landlord. "

Tennessee Supreme Court. Giggers v. Memphis Housing Authority, No. W2006-00304-SC-R11-CV. Feb. 3, 2009. Lawyers USA Nos. 993-443 (majority) and 993-444 (concurrence/dissent).

Copyright 2009 Dolan Media Newswires


Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions    Privacy Policy

© 2016 by KnowledgePlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Advanced Search | Legal / Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Feedback / Contact Us

kp2 Version:   Host: ip-10-83-51-59  C3_DB=c3@localhost:3306; GEO_DB=plex-sandbox@localhost; KPLEX_DB=kplex@localhost:3306; SESSION_DB=session@localhost:3306;