login    register    help     
 
Calendar
 
DataPlace
 
Expert Chats
 
Groups
 
Multimedia
 
Top News Stories
 
Week In Review Newsletter
 
About KnowledgePlex Inc.
 
 
All Topics
 
Affordable Housing Development & Finance
 
Economic Revitalization
 
Fair Housing
 
Homelessness
 
Homeownership & Mortgage Markets
 
Land Use & Housing Planning
 
Organizational Development
 
Personal Finance & Asset Creation
 
Public Housing
 
Social & Comprehensive Development
 

FBI Opens IndyMac Probe

Ben Baeder
San Gabriel Valley Tribune (California)
July 17, 2008
LexisNexis®
STORY TOOLS
   
RELATED ON DATAPLACE
   
RELATED TOPICS
   
RATE THIS
 
I hate it   I love it
     
1

2

3

4

5
     
 
DIGG THIS
 
 

PASADENA - The FBI has opened an investigation into now-defunct IndyMac Bancorp Inc. in connection with home loans made to risky borrowers.

According to The Associated Press, it was not clear when the inquiry of the bank began.

In an e-mail, a FBI spokesman said the agency was investigating 21 companies but declined to confirm whether IndyMac was one of them.

"Given the volatility of today's subprime market, we have seen an increase in subprime-related complaints," said spokesman Jason Pack. "To protect the integrity of our cases, we do not confirm or comment about specific companies that may or may not be a part of our investigations."

IndyMac spokesman Evan Wagner said he knew nothing of the investigation until he read about it Wednesday on a news Web site.

During the housing boom, IndyMac specialized in loaning to people with credit in the 660-to-720 range, which is just below the best credit rating.

Many of the loans were given without income documentation. Contrary to media reports, IndyMac lent only about 3 percent to 4 percent of loans to people in the "subprime" category.

A spokeswoman for a group that criticized IndyMac in a report last month for lax lending controls said she was not surprised by the investigation.

"If an institution fails and you are going to have to pay (depositors) out of the FDIC, you want to find out what happened," said Kathleen Day, a spokeswoman for the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Responsible Lending.

"We're not the regulators," Day said. "We're not inside there. But it is clear to us that IndyMac was a bad lender."

Last week, IndyMac's assets were seized by federal regulators and transferred to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation after the mortgage lender succumbed to the pressures of tighter credit, tumbling home prices and rising foreclosures.

The bank was the seventh largest home lender in 2007, and is the largest regulated thrift to fail and the second-largest financial institution to close in U.S. history.

FDIC spokesman David Barr could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

An examination of IndyMac's lending practices might focus on whether the bank took part in predatory lending, said Anthony Pratkanis, a professor at UC Santa Cruz, who has looked into the loan industry as part of his research.

Pratkanis said he was commenting on the industry in general, not specifically IndyMac.

An investigation into a lender would try to establish that IndyMac hid important information from borrowers, such as balloon payments, rate adjustments and prepayment penalties, Pratkanis said.

"In some loans, important things were kind of sandwiched in there where you couldn't find them," he said of the stacks of paper that people are supposed to read before borrowing money for a home.

A jury or judge, he said, would have to decide whether IndyMac was diligent in its duty to make sure people knew what they were getting into.

Pratkanis, who has published works about how people are influenced by society, said home buyers were caught in a lifestyle that treated credit as an asset to acquire wealth instead of something to pay back.

Starting when consumer credit rules loosened in the early 1990s, many Americans stopped saving money and started spending credit, he said.

"Everyone was speculating. It became normal," Pratkanis said. "But you should never speculate unless you have money to lose. And most people did not have enough money that they could afford to lose their homes."

As the real estate market heated up, some buyers, brokers and lenders threw out logic - and their ethics - as people around them began treating real estate like a bargaining chip to get more money, he said.

"You get this last-chance mentality," Pratkanis said. "People think, `I'll never get in. I have to buy a home before it gets too expensive. I'll never have that American dream.' And some companies took advantage of that. There was trickery used in marketing some loans."

The Associated Press contributed to this story

ben.baeder@sgvn.com

(626) 962-8811, Ext. 2230

Copyright 2008 MediaNews Group, Inc. and Los Angeles Newspaper Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved

 

Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions    Privacy Policy

   
© 2008 by KnowledgePlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Advanced Search | Legal / Terms of Use | Partners | Privacy Policy | Feedback / Contact Us
 

kp2x Version:   Host: w2  C3_DB=c3@kplexdb:3306; GEO_DB=dp-prod@db7; KPLEX_DB=kplex@kplexdb:3306; SESSION_DB=session@kplexdb:3306;